The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA), led by Minister Nyesom Wike, has re-issued a strict directive banning the use of smartphones and other smart devices among civil servants on Salary Grade Level (SGL) 14 and below during official working hours. Under the new rule, affected workers are only allowed to use basic “torch-light” phones for communication while on duty.
The policy, communicated through a circular (Ref. FCT/DLA/259/III) dated 28 November 2025, was addressed to all Heads of Divisions, Units, the Department of Land Administration (DLA), and the Abuja Geographic Information System (AGIS). The circular emphasized that smartphones, smartwatches, tablets, and all internet-enabled gadgets are strictly prohibited within office premises during work hours.
To enforce full compliance, management has provided designated storage lockers where staff must deposit their devices upon arrival. Workers can only retrieve them during official break periods.
According to the memo, the decision followed a general staff meeting held on 18 November 2025, where employees reportedly agreed to restrict phone usage in order to “enhance productivity and reduce distractions.” Only basic phones without internet access are permitted to ensure essential communication.
The new enforcement takes effect on Monday, 1 December 2025, and defaulters risk disciplinary action.
This is not the first time such a directive is being issued. Earlier in November, AGIS and DLA staff received a similar internal memo banning phones entirely for those on Grade 14 and below, a move that sparked criticism within the civil service.
Why the sudden clampdown?
Insider sources suggest the policy may have been influenced by the recent viral video showing Minister Wike in a heated confrontation with a Naval officer over a disputed Abuja land. The clip reportedly circulated widely on internal WhatsApp groups, prompting concerns about information leaks within the system.
Mixed Reactions
The ban has triggered sharp criticism from several civil servants, labour advocates, and rights groups. Many describe the move as “primitive,” “unrealistic,” and “anti-labour,” arguing that it restricts workers’ rights and fails to align with modern administrative practices.
Despite the growing concerns, neither AGIS nor the broader FCTA has released an official public explanation for the reinstated policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment